For Authors
Submit with confidence.
Submission guidelines, the review workflow, and answers to common questions from prospective authors.
Submission Guidelines
Manuscript formatting
Review Timeline
From submission to publication
Triage & editorial check
1–7 daysThe editorial office verifies scope fit, formatting, ethics statements, and similarity screening. Manuscripts outside scope or missing required statements are returned without external review.
Editor assignment
2–5 daysA subject-matched handling editor is assigned. The editor reads the manuscript, checks for competing interests, and shortlists reviewers.
Reviewer invitations
5–10 daysReviewer invitations are sent in waves until a minimum of two independent reviewers accept. A third is invited when reports diverge.
Under review
3–4 weeksReviewers evaluate the manuscript against the standing checklist and return anonymised reports through the editorial system.
Editor decision
1–3 days after reports arriveThe handling editor synthesises the reports and issues one of: accept, minor revision, major revision, reject-and-resubmit, or reject.
Revision round(s)
Author-controlled windowMinor revisions: 2 weeks suggested. Major revisions: 4–8 weeks suggested. Extensions are granted on request — email the editorial office.
Final acceptance & production
1–2 weeksCopy-editing, proof review, metadata registration, and scheduling for publication.
Publication
On the next publication slot after proofs are approvedThe article is published open access under CC BY 4.0 with a stable Aperture Papers identifier (DOI once registration is live).
Author tips
How to speed up processing
Most delays happen before external review even starts. These practical steps consistently shave days — sometimes weeks — off the total timeline.
- Follow the Author Guidelines exactly — formatting, section order, and word/abstract limits.
- Submit a fully anonymised main manuscript; identifying details in the file trigger a re-upload request.
- Include every required statement at submission — ethics, consent, data availability, funding, conflicts, CRediT, and AI use.
- Deposit data and code in a public repository before submission and cite the accession/DOI.
- Provide a one-page cover letter with a clear novelty statement and 3–5 suggested reviewers with ORCID and institutional emails.
- Make sure all co-authors have approved submission and their ORCIDs are on the title page.
- Reply promptly to editorial-office queries — most re-upload requests are resolved same-day when authors are responsive.
- For revisions, submit a point-by-point response alongside a tracked-changes manuscript and a clean version.
- Flag any waiver or hardship context up front so the editorial office can process it in parallel with review.
Ranges above are targets, not guarantees. Complex manuscripts, reviewer availability, or holidays may extend the timeline. Status updates are sent to the corresponding author at every stage.
Frequently Asked Questions
Common author questions
Downloadable templates will be published alongside the submission portal. In the interim, please email editorialoffice@aperturepapers.com to request the current draft template.